Last week, week 7:
- 3,500m elevation gain
- 80 km
- 12.5 hr
This following two weeks of over 3000m elevation gain, will hill sprint and ME workouts done.
Getting the hang of this Big Vert training plan.
Last week, week 7:
This following two weeks of over 3000m elevation gain, will hill sprint and ME workouts done.
Getting the hang of this Big Vert training plan.
Last week was my first of doing over 3000m elevation gain in a week of training, without including races.
I may have done it once or twice before but along time ago.
I had planned to be doing over 3000m+ regularly since last November. But it turned out to be more demanding than I expected.
I have just completed the first four weeks of my second run through the Big Vert plan: three weeks loading + one week recovery.
So far, all good.
As the table below shows, I've been able to do much more work than the first time through.
|
|
First run through |
Second run through |
||||||||
|
Wk |
m+ |
km |
hr (run) |
ME |
HS |
m+ |
km |
hr (run) |
ME |
HS |
|
1 |
1356 |
58 |
6.5 |
0 |
0 |
2475 |
64 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1244 |
51 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
2572 |
83 |
9.5 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
2461 |
58 |
7.5 |
0 |
0 |
2536 |
54 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
|
4 |
596 |
15.3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1390 |
44 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
|
total |
5657 |
182.3 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
8973 |
245 |
31.5 |
3 |
3 |
* Week 4 is the recovery week; ME = muscular endurance workout; HS = hill sprints
I'm just about where I wanted be. I planned to do a much longer long run in week 3, which would have pushed the totals up for that week, but I couldn't because of other commitments.
I've been able to do three of each of these workouts (the prescribed amount), and now I have hardly any, if any, noticeable fatigue the next day.
The hill sprints feel really good. I've found a very steep hill to do them on and have learnt to bound up it at full effort.
I decided to add in some flat Z2 workouts in this run though of the plan to hopefully maintain and build flat running economy. So far I've managed two in the second week.
These are also great aerobic workouts as it's easier to maintain the intensity running on the flat.
A nigglish peroneal tendon, coming in the third week. But I was able to work around it and could still do the ME and sprint workouts that followed.
Now that I'm more comfortable with these more intense workouts, I find I can handle them even with slight niggles.
I'm still not sure having planned rest days each week from running is best for me and my tendency for tendon niggles and injuries (the above niggle came after a rest day), but I am giving it a shot, and surely these rest days are keeping me fresh, especially the two I had in the recovery week.
So, on target and ready for the second block!
That's the same number of sessions I did in the whole first run-through of the Big Vert plan.
I've found a great place to do them, too (pictured below).
![]() |
| Average gradient probably over 30% |
![]() |
| From the top looking down |
I was doing the hill sprints on the road. But the steepest section I could find was just below 20% average gradient.
I hadn't thought about doing them on the trails. But there are actually many non-asphalt steep slopes around here. The problem is the closest ones to me don't have much traction.
But the one I found is doable. There's only one step I need to be careful taking, and the average gradient must be over 30%.
And now that I've found I good place to do these, I'm finding these workouts fun. I go slower on this steeper, dirt slope, but I can go all out without worrying about something snapping as I felt it might on the road.
This article confirms my suspicion that as runners we need to:
Why not stretch the calves?
A little bit of stretching might be OK, but I have found it's easy to go overboard and cause injury by stretching the calves too much. Rolling seems OK. But again, gently.
The massage gun also feels good on the calves, at least the sides of them in the thinly-muscled areas.
Stretching the calves in the deep squat position (either by doing deep squats or just squatting down on purpose to stretch) is a good way to keep it within a safe range.
Holding a front squat is also a great isometric exercise for the tibialis anterior.
I've actually found isometrics to be a far better way to deal with calf niggles and pains: it gets rid of the pain and coupled with isotonic lifts (calf raises) it seems to help make the calves more injury resistant.
Because there is a riddle of stretching for runners.
You know you don't want to too tight in places, but you can't just become a yoga fiend. And it's not just about doing the right stretches; it's about avoiding the harmful ones.
I'm going to start watching my weight.
I've always kept an eye on it, but now I want to track it in detail, for a while at least. Mainly to work out what I should be aiming for. Because right now it's just aimlessly going up.
I tell myself I'm putting on muscle. I have become a pullup and kettlebell maniac, after all. But isn't that always what we say when we put on weight?
I'm definitely stronger than a few years ago. But I'm sure I've added a bit of unnecessary fat as well. Or maybe it's not unnecessary? That's what I want to find out.
When I left school, a weighed around 70kg.
When I started running more competitively (I mean entering races and training more as I never really stopped running after high school), in my late 20s, I weighed over 80kg.
I actually ran pretty good times then, even though I'd just started training more. I was fatter, but I had a lot more speed and power. Youth was on my side too, though.
Then at around 33 or 34, I did a lot of yoga and fasting, and my weight dropped below 70kg. This was when I ran my fastest times, but I don't know if it was the weight loss or the training --- I had some good patches of training at this time.
From then my weight hovered between 70 and 73kg mark. I then dropped a lot of weight around 2014, to 67kg, I think.
Then it hung around 72/73kg until 2019.
From 2019 to now, I've steadily climbed up to 75/76kg.
My weight now might be ideal for what I'm doing --- maybe I could be a bit lighter and faster, but I feel strong and robust.
Anyway, I'm going to follow my weight more closely, along with some other metrics like body fat, to see if I can work out if I'm healthiest (i.e. running fast but feeling strong) around my current weight or in the 72/73 range.
This will mean taking some measures and trying to drop a bit of weight while maintaining strength and robustness.
I don't know if the 70kg mark is feasible or even desirable. I'd probably have to give up too much strength.
After having an Achilles niggles at the end of January, I started strengthening my calves.
Progressively.
I started with static holds and moved on to single-leg calf raises, seated and standing.
I started with 4x8 at 14kg for single-leg standing calf raises on 11 February and now (start of May) can do 32kg for the same sets and reps.
I'm making similar progress with the seated single-leg raise (now up to 28kg), although I started a bit later with this one and haven't gone as far (apparently it should be stronger than standing).
I've also seen a big improvement in the Bulgarian or split squat over the same period.
I started doing 16kg 4x8 times and now can do 26kg 4x6 times.
But the weight is not the whole story with the Bulgarian squat. I had a real weakness on my left side. It felt like my adductor had rolled up my leg after each set the first couple of times.
I persevered, though, doing the exercise very slowly, and now I can do it no problem. Although my left side is still shakier than my right.
I've also been progressing my squats and hex deadlift, but this is more covering old ground. I've trained these exercises with intent before.
The real new ground has come with progressing calf and single-leg exercise strength exercises. I've made good gains, and hopefully am a more resilient running because of it.
And now I've reached the last stage of calf rehab and strengthening, having just added in skipping as a warm-up. I'll soon plateau off with the raises. I think my calves are now close to strong enough for running and injury prevention.
In the coming weeks, I'll also turn down the pure-strength exercises a notch as I get back into muscular endurance training and more running.
They come up, and I get over them in a few days with no fuss.
Last week, I got heel pain after a longer flat run in Z2. Probably from doing this workout too soon after a trail race.
How did I get over it?
Barely a bump in the road.
I think it's not only the approach but the fact that I'm always doing strength training that helps me get over these things so quickly.
This time though (starting next week) Mike Foote's Big Vert Plan in preparation for the Ultra Pirineu in October, I aim to:
10/10!
A jagged profile with some nice views of the sea and Barcelona and some steep and technical sections on the other side of the mountain.
The last part of the race was fast (downhill and less technical).
Overall, the course was tough but fast for a half-marathon trail race with around a kilometer of climbing.
19.33km with 1065m+ by my watch.
I felt slow at the beginning on the runnable uphill slopes but strong on all the steep sections and especially towards the end of the race.
This slowness and strength are surely due to the type of training I've been doing of late: lots of hiking and strength work and hardly any flat running at more than recovery pace.
I felt surprisingly good descending on both technical and non-technical terrain. Surprising because I haven't focused on this at all recently, although I have done a lot of ginger descending. Who'd've thought that would help?
I pushed pretty much right to the end, with an average heart rate of around 164/5 throughout.
My time: 2:11:31 in 70th place overall (28th in my category)
To get ready for ultras with lots of climbing, specifically, the Ultra Montseny I did on 10 April, which ended up being 78km with over 4700m+, and an ultra I'm doing this October (100km with 6600m+).
I'd also read Training for the Uphill Athlete and wanted to try out a plan with this type of training: with a focus on strength and elevation gain.
My recent history before starting the plan:
I did 19 weeks of the plan in the lead-up to the race, but I:
My body couldn't handle everything in the plan.
This kind of training was new for me, and I had to adapt it on the fly owing to niggles, especially in my calves, Achilles and feet.
However, I didn't feel overly tired or fatigued and any stage. This kind of training actually felt quite easy. This made it frustrating that the niggles didn't let me do more.
Even so, I trained consistently, having at the most one day off from running here and there owing to niggles.
To adapt the plan to my niggles, I mainly just cut the length of runs and skipped the more intense stuff (i.e. hill sprints and Z3 runs) as needed.
I went from averaging just over 1200m+ a week to around 1900m+. And I can now easily do 2500m+ a week.
Next stop, 3000m+ a week!
The plan made me strong enough to handle all the climbing and descending without a hint of muscle cramping during the 13 plus hours of the race, whereas I had gotten cramps in the previous two ultras I'd done.
However, conditions were ideal for running this time, so maybe it wasn't the training but just the weather.
Even so, this race was twice as long in time and elevation gain as those other ultras, so the training probably did have something to do with it.
Here's the comparison between an AeT test (using the Uphill Athlete drift test) I did at the start of the plan and one I did after my goal race:
|
|
Date |
Test time |
Avg pace |
Avg Hr 1st 1/4 |
Avg Hr 1st 1/2 |
Avg Hr |
Avg pwr |
Pa:hr |
Pw:hr |
EF |
|
1 |
3/12/20 |
60' |
5:04 |
145 |
145 |
145 |
253 |
1.33% |
1.44% |
1.74 |
|
2 |
24/04/21 |
60' |
5:11 |
151 |
151 |
152 |
247 |
3.33% |
2.57% |
1.63 |
I did have a headwind for the last 40' of test 2. But even so, I was clearly less efficient in the second test, going slower at a higher average heart rate. In neither case does it look like I'm was at my AeT threshold (probably 155 now).
I half expected this slowing down.
After all, I went from running mostly on the flat (at mostly easy paces) to running on the flat only for recovery runs.
Also, I was definitely not, and aren't now, aerobically deficient, so just staying in zone 1 on hilly terrain (which I did most of the time) was not going to help me on the flat as it might if I'd been untrained.
So I got worse at something I wasn't doing. Logical, I suppose. Although I did hope that the downhill running might keep my efficient on the flat. Alas, it wasn't the case.
I don't know. I will redo my AnT test to see if I've gotten faster over that course.
But the AnT test might not be a valid indicator of what I probably got more efficient at on this plan.
The AnT test, at least on the course I did it on, is a measure of running uphill at threshold pace, whereas my recent training has probably got me better at moving uphill on steeper slopes at an aerobic pace.
I'll retest anyway.
I'm going to do the plan again in preparation for a 100km ultra with 6600m+ in October (Ultra Pirineu).
This time, I'll up the weekly vertical gain (hopefully averaging over 2500m+ with weeks of over 3000 m+) and add in the hill sprints and Z3 if I can.
I'll think about adding in a Z2 run on the flat each week or so. See if I can arrest that efficiency slide.
Some time after writing this post, I realised using the AeT test I mention above might be flawed for testing whether I got slower for three reasons.
First, I had breakfast and coffee before this test whereas all the previous tests had been done fasted. This surely meant that my HR was higher than if I'd done it like all the others: i.e. fasted.
Second, it might not be a fair comparison as I was comparing doing the test after not having run in this way for over four months with the last test of this type I'd done after having done four or five of them. I'd had practice and had clearly gotten better at this type of run, which does seem to get my fitter. Perhaps I'm suited to it or it's because I hardly ever run in zone 2 so there are lots of benefits to be gained.
Third, in none of the tests prior to or this last one had I found my AeT: I'd always aimed to low. So the comparison was always going to be speculative.
Either way, I'm pretty sure I got slower and less efficient on the flat. So I'm still going to (and have in fact) add in some flat Z2 training. It seems to get me fitter and running faster on the flat. And this is useful even for events with lots of vert.
This year, I'm following a training plan of my own creation, the core of which is a four-week cycle with one recovery week. Ea...